The idea of the “knowledge worker” has been around for over a half-century since Peter Drucker coined it back in 1959. Today it seems a bit old-school to use the phrase. But I wouldn’t file it away too quickly, because there is a new kind of knowledge worker in town.

Its no secret that Social Media allows companies to identify and connect with their key customers and brand influencers. A good, ongoing social media scan will tell you who is making the most and (importantly) the best kind of noise about your brand. And guess what: those key customers are not just buying your services, they are in fact your new knowledge workers.

Think about it. Your best customers are not blindly engaging your brand based on whim or slick advertising. They have thought about your brand. They have compared it to the competition. They often defend your brand (to themselves and to others) against those competitors. They tell people about it, often, passionately. In the best cases they wear your brand on their sleeve. They have a deep knowledge about your products and the market that most brand managers would kill for.

Brands that take the next step and connect with their key customers and let them into the process have much to gain. It could be at a base layer of simply listening to what they are saying – and responding appropriately – or to the more extreme level of creating consumer advisors. At the end of the day, you wouldn’t want to lose your employees who carry around mission critical knowledge. Same goes for  your best customers.

And if customers are the new “knowledge worker”, then what happens to the current ones? It looks like Rich Lesser has figured that out. He calls them “insight workers” who can take that knowledge, glean insights and implications to shape direction, solve problems and create impact.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Authenticity is the word of the day when it comes to social media, isn’t it. But its really no surprise. Why? Because authenticity has power. It is the ability to speak your truth – not a manufactured truth. Not a series of words designed to elicit a specific response.

At the same time, much of what we hear about with regards to social media is about vanity. Self-aggrandizing tweets have prompted the site Tweeting Too Hard, where, as the site states, “Self-important tweets get the recognition they deserve.”

Interestingly, a lot of the tweets on Tweeting Too Hard are incredibly authentic. Check out this regular (who now has protected her tweets, to the chagrin of the fans of  Tweeting Too Hard) and who obviously is quite removed from the reality that most of us share:

Oy.

Vain. Completely, and yes, authentically, vain. Authenticity is being honest – letting what ever it is that you are (laid back, smart, snobbish, witty, and yes, vain) hang out.

But  many people have what I would call “Twitter Angst”, and confuse it with vanity. In spans from anxiety about what people might think of their posts to unrealistic expectations of how much their followers are paying attention to them.  They might tweet with expectations of a sure fire response of multiple retweets, and then suffer when that doesn’t happen. “But that was an awesome, pithy tweet! WTF?” That’s not vanity. And neither is it authentic.

The trick with Twitter is to speak your mind honestly and see what happens. The rest of the world might not be listening, and thats ok. Think about the stream you follow and how many tweets you just simply miss. Unless you’re Chris Brogan (who shows up on Tweeting too Hard too, by the way), there’s probably not a lot of people waiting with baited breath for your next 140 character utterance.

Remember, there’s power in being authentic regardless of the response. Be authentic. Be vain if that’s who you are. Be authentically vain. But get past the twitter angst – it  just isn’t worth it.

Enhanced by Zemanta
LONDON - FEBRUARY 03: (FILE PHOTO)  In this ph...

Image by Getty Images via @daylife

So Quit Facebook day came and went with a bit of a whimper. It got lots of press, but at the end of the day, the solution it proposed to Facebook’s less-than-honourable privacy play was just too radical.

The problem is that we want to continue to connect with our friends and family and right now FB is the best way to do that. But unfortunately its what people DON”T see that is the issue. They don’t see friends of friends lurking on their page. They don’t see their profile data being stored permanently by third party app builders. Then maybe sold by those app builders.

So what a FB user to do? Easy. Don’t delete your account. Just erase your profile.

Think about it. The thing that has Mark Zuckerberg all wet-dreamy is the oodles of details people have provided to him about themselves. Likes. Dislikes. Musical interests. Political leanings. Location. There is a treasure trove of data that any marketer would die for and Monsieur Zuckerberg knows it.

So erase your data. Be there in name and birth date only. You’re connected to all your friends and family now anyway right? They know all about you don’t they? So all that data is just there for the benefit of Facebook.

I know its not radical. “I Killed My FB Data!” probably doesn’t belong on a t-shirt. But if you want to use Facebook and connect with your friends without worrying that a whole heck of a lot of people know a whole heck of a lot more than you want to admit to yourself, spend five minutes and strip your profile clean.

Hmmm… “Do the Facebook Strip!” Now that I could see on a t-shirt.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

I recently did a social media scan on a certain product and its competitors. Its standard procedure now isn’t it, especially for a pitch situation, which this was.

Often scans like this – looking at the noise around the category, the brand, and key competitors – simply reaffirm what you already intuitively know through more formal research. But you do your homework, and glean what insights you can, and feed them into your strategic process to come up with a compelling strategy for your pitch.  But this scan was different.

conversation cloud

What people don't say can speak volumes.

Using our scanning tool (Radian6), I looked at the brand we were pitching for, as well as a set of competitive brands.  The results for one of the competitors – the one the client was most concerned about – was astounding to me. There was not one single attitude or emotion noticeably associated with the SM posts about the brand. Furthermore, the conversation cloud was pretty much a wall of words in the same small black font. Nothing stood out in what is a very emotional category. Nothing. My initial thought was, “Wow. This brand is dead! It’s a commodity!”

The insight was further proof to our team that the client was in fact worried about the wrong competitor. We went on to pitch an idea that enabled the client to reshape the market, rather than to merely play by the rules of the current market dynamics. The result: fantastic feedback in pitch and an invite to the next round.

As you can tell, I can’t reveal details or the names of the brands. I wish I could. Given the amount of advertising the competitor does, you’d be amazed by how little brand engagement there is. But its proof of the power of the insight that social media scans can provide.

At the very least, it just goes to show that what your customers aren’t saying is just as important as what they are saying.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

(This post is also featured on the Euro RSCG Worldwide Social Media Site www.eurorscgsocial.com)

Social Media has enabled Brands to become more human than ever before. Community managers are facebooking and tweeting on behalf of the Brand, and the good ones embody the brand’s essential characteristics and tone the best.

Pretty cool stuff, and a real development in the history of Branding.

With the increase in marketing-focused social media, we need to have ways to measure how good a brand’s social media activity is. Since Brands are acting a whole lot more like, well, people, it seems worth while to look at how Social Intelligence is measured in us humans, and then see if that can be applied to brands.

Once of the pioneers in understanding Social Intelligence on a human level is Dr. Karl Albrecht.

His understanding of Social Intelligence includes 5 key dimensions:

Situational Radar: The ability to “read” situations, understand the social context that influences behavior, and choose behavioral strategies that are most likely to be successful.

Presence: Also known as “bearing,” presence is the external sense of one’s self that others perceive: confidence, self-respect and self-worth.

Authenticity: The opposite of being “phony,” authenticity is a way of behaving which engenders a perception that one is honest with one’s self as well as others.

Clarity: The ability to express one’s self clearly, use language effectively, explain concepts clearly and persuade with ideas.

Empathy: More than just an internal sense of relatedness or appreciation for the experiences of others, empathy in this context represents the ability to create a sense of connectedness with others; to get them on your wavelength and invite them to move with and toward you rather than away and against you.

All of these seem to apply quite readily to the digital social media space as a way to evaluate a Brand’s  social media activity.

Situational Radar: Are you aware of what’s going on – are you listening to the posts as well as the context of  those posts? Do you modify your actions in response?

Presence: Does your social media have a voice? Are there regular posts? Is it engaging and u- beat or has your social media personality lapsed into a wall-flower?

Authenticity: This is the big one. There have been far too many examples of brands getting busted for dishonesty through social media.

Clarity: This is almost a must have for today’s social media. 140 characters required clarity, one way or another!

Empathy: Creating connectedness is one of the critical things in social media – not just through tone and attitude, but though actions as well. Are you leveraging social media to promote your environmental or humanitarian activities and goals?

You get the sense that you could easily create a score-card out of these criteria to measure your social media, identify weak spots, and plan for improvement. It could be the starting point for surveys and research into a Brand’s social media efforts.

To me its very interesting and revealing how well Albrecht’s Social Intelligence  framework applies to social media. At the end of the day, we’re people, and , we want to be treated like people. Not only by our friends, families, and employers, but also by the brands and businesses that we engage with as well.

I wasn’t excited.

Really.

Zero anticipation.

Nada.

Zilch.

In the weeks and days leading up to the Olympics in Vancouver, I couldn’t have cared less. I’ve always been a proud Canadian, but the whole “Own the Podium” deal just hadn’t grabbed me. It wasn’t that I din’t care, I was sure that news of medals would cuase my pareiotic heart to stir, but i just wasn’t into it. I didn’t feel part of it. These Olympics were just not for me.

But then it happened. During the opening ceremonies Twitter was buzzing with commentary. And suddenly I was hooked. Perhaps it was being able to share the experience with so many people in real time. Suddenly the whole thing was engaging, intriguing and compelling. The first Social Media Olympics were on.

Twitter, the social media outlet I use most often, allowed me to share the inspiration I felt upon hearing Shane Koyczan exclaim “We are choices“. It allowed me to voice my displeasure at CTV for showing footage of Nodar Kumaritashvili’s death. I actually wanted to watch Joannie Rochette skate. (Yes. I admit, I wanted to watch figure skating.)

By then the magic of the games had really grabbed me. The first gold by a Canadian on Canadian soil. The enthusiasm of Jon Montgomery. Then the  golds started piling on. The British were dissing us, and we collectively said, “screw off“. These games were much more than they ever would have been for me had it not been for Twitter enabling me to add to the conversation. Suddenly, I wasn’t watching, a silent spectator. I was participating. I was part of this incredible re-branding of Canadians as a deeply proud patriotic people.

And then yesterday, during the big Men’s Hockey final, I shared in the experience with tweeps both north and south of the border as Go Canada GO was trending on Twitter.

And finally, I tweeted this shortly after Sidney Crosby scored his epic goal:

Gold Medal Tweet

For this proud Canuck, it couldn’t have gotten much better.

Every Marketer wants raving fans. The kind of customers that go out of the way to extol the benefits and values of their product. The ones who actively engage in social media and are driving forces of viral campaigns. When you look at the brands that have such a fanatical base of customers (think Apple, Honda, Nike…) its clear that these brands pay off their marketing message with a product that meets or even surpasses expectations.

Marketing will always fail when that brand promise presented in its marketing is not backed up in the product. Tiger Woods is giving us a real-time example of what happens when the seedy truth beneath a squeaky clean image comes out. The Tiger Woods brand has taken a massive drubbing in the last month. Suddenly what you see in the Nike, Tag Heuer, and GatorAid ads is not what these brands bargained for.

All marketers need to keep this in mind when making promises. The Rogers and Bell in Canada have recently been forced to stop making “most reliable” and ” fastest” network claims. No wonder the population cheered when Wind Mobile was allowed to enter the market. No one believed them anyway! Pharma marketers also need to remember this. Perhaps the worst culprits of the “say anything” approach to marketing has made them one of the least trusted of all industries.

Marketing is about your target – but you can’t forget about the product. You need to know what it is, and really understand how it benefits your target. Otherwise your marketing turns into hollow lip service, and the fact that your customers are all connected through social media means news of overblown, unsubstantiated marketing will spread rapidly. The negative feeling of a purchase decision where the product isn’t what you expected make for great status updates.

Know thy customer. Know thy product. And make sure the product pays off everything you’ve been saying.

I just finished reading Seth Goldstein’s very cool article in Tech Crunch and he got me thinking.

Is Marshall McLuhan’s famous postulation “the medium is the message” actually going to unravel at the hands of social media? Seth points out that social media “has led to an Internet experience based less on pages and more on people…” and that “the medium is the message…is the member.” Is McLuhan (gulp!) dead?

I can see where Seth is coming from.  Social networks certainly make the person behind the tweet or the update appear to be much more present. Seth calls these “Identity Systems” due to the huge amount of a user’s personality and identity that go into their social network streams.Medium

With all this personal information placed on line the scrim of the medium itself becomes more and more transparent. But that doesn’t mean the medium is disappearing.

If we look at the medium of social networks, several technologies (from the actual social systems to mobile) are giving it the following important characteristics:

  • always on
  • always accessible
  • always personal

You can easily wrap that up into WE ARE ALL ALWAYS CONNECTED.

So isn’t that what Social Media is telling us? Simply that we’re all always connected? That we’re all in this together, and we make it up together every single day? That you’re as much a part of this as students in Iran, or protesters in the Amazon, or people floating in a plane on the Hudson, or your family back home in Saskatoon, or the President of the United States?

The medium is in fact still the message. And the message is profoundly simple.

evil_googleGoogle is famous for its philosophic credo “Do no evil.”

But do a quick google search on “Is Google Evil?” and you’ll see a ton of opinion that states Google is just too big, and knows too damned much, and have concluded that they have indeed crossed over into evil empire territory. Throw in their free products like analytics and the new turn-by-turn nav that have significantly upset the metrics and gps nav industries, and there seems to be quite a case.

But after doing a bit of work for my kid’s school – where I successfully built two websites, implemented analytics, and set up an adwords account through google all for the cost of free – I have to say it. Google is decidedly not evil.

Here’s why.

Its Not About Free Stuff.

Its easy to say Google gives away free stuff and such good stuff that they have steamrolled competition in an unfair manner. Maps. Analytics. Mobile. Now turn-by-turn nav.  But its not about free. Its about accessibility.

The Accessible Web

Google makes the web accessible. By that, I mean, Google is not just about helping people find stuff online (and collecting reams of data). It is about enabling people to engage fully in the web without having to manage any kind of back-end. Its about making the web simple so that it can be part of normal daily life for as many people as possible.

Is Google being completely altruistic? Of course not. More sites and surfers mean more advertisers and ad clickers. But its symbiotic. Google makes money from ads only if advertisers make money through them as well.

Evil is a Loaded Termgoogle_halo

Perhaps Google set itself up for criticism by including the remark about Evil in their corporate philosophy. It certainly is a loaded term. At the end of the day they may have lied, cheated, or stolen on some or many levels. But in terms of enabling anyone – and I mean anyone – to engage in the web, from simple search to a means of promoting themselves or their business, they are certainly leveling the playing field and making the web a pretty democratic place. That in itself, I think, is definitely not evil and may be doing more than a little bit of good.

Services Marketing was not a popular course when I was doing my business degree.  I can’t even remember why I decided to take it at the time, but I had a sense that it would be important somehow. It’s turning out to be incredibly relevant to Digital Marketing as companies engage in Social Media for promotion, loyalty and customer service initiatives.service

3 New P’s: People, Physical Evidence, Process
The big thing about services marketing was the 7 – not 4 – the 7 P’s. To your regular product, place, promotion and price, Services Marketing added people, physical evidence, and process. While the focus of this thinking was applied to the delivery of physical services, it is absolutely relevant to any company now engaging in any kind of social media.

People.
The people managing your online communities, be they twitter accounts or Facebook pages, as well as corporate bloggers, are now direct representatives of your brand. Their style, attitude and demeanor are your brand’s style, attitude and demeanor. They need to understand your target market and what makes them tick. Whether or not you outsource this to an agency or keep it in house, these people are incredibly important to you. Because even if your brand isn’t a service brand, by opening a social media avenue for customer service or promotion, you are staking your brand’s reputation and equity on those people and how they carry themselves.

Physical Evidence.
It doesn’t take much to get a bad customer service experience posted on FAILBlog, where it can hang around for weeks, months or years. The physical evidence is now in the form of videos, screen shots and retweets.  On the flip side, those same systems are the very ones marketers hope their customers use to spread a recommendation about their brand. Its just so easy for consumers to share their interactions and experiences with your brand, both good and bad.

For example, check out Exhibit A: a tweet I sent today after @Starbucks replied to a tweet I sent on the weekend bemoaning a perpetually malfunctioning Starbucks card reader. I have to say I was tickled when they followed up. If it gets fixed, I’ll be one happy customer.

starbucks

Process.
As everyone dives in, process becomes incredibly important. What authority to community managers have to make decisions? What is the chain of command for other decisions that need management authority, when time is of the essence. How tied in is your social media promotion to customer service in case a customer message comes through a promotional social media channel rather than customer service? What internal rules are their for corporate bloggers, tweeters, or Facebookers who in some way shape and form are out their representing your brand. If you’re not already, its essential to get organized!

Because Marketing is a Service.
You can actually start re-thinking all of your Marketing efforts as a set of services you provide to your customers so that they can engage with your brand through any brand touch-point at any time.

From your TV spots to Websites to Social Media to Customer Service, your marketing tactics should all be trying to do the same thing: make it as easy as possible for customers to connect with and choose your brand. A review of that old Services Marketing may well help you do it better. And the ones that do it best stand a much better chance to win.

About this blog

I’m Mark Makuch and I’ve been a strategically-minded digital agency account lead for about 10 years. I’m based in Toronto, currently at Capital C. These are my thoughts on, you guessed it, digital marketing, interactive connections and our wired world, all from a Canadian perspective. I’ll try to be usually interesting, sometimes witty, often intelligent, oh, and always Canadian. Note: I won’t pretend to know everything. I hope you enjoy!

Twitter Timeline

    follow me on Twitter

     

    May 2012
    M T W T F S S
    « Feb    
     123456
    78910111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    28293031  

    Twitter Updates